We are intentionally small. We add people rarely, and only where the practice genuinely needs the depth. If your experience is close to what we do, we would like to hear from you.
We grow carefully. Our next addition is more often decided by a considered conversation than by a job requisition. We do not run open reqs, and we do not filter senior people through junior gatekeepers.
If your experience is genuinely deep in one of the practice areas we work in, and the idea of leading engagements in a small, senior firm appeals more than another seat inside a large consultancy, write to us. The first exchange is with a partner, not with a form.
Not a list of open positions. A description of the experience we are always interested to hear about, across the practices we work in.
People who have taken AI use cases from ambition to production at meaningful scale. Familiar with the model choices, agents, evaluation, safety work and the token economics behind it.
People who have designed modern data platforms, run governance conversations regulators would recognise, and made analytics change what a business actually does on Monday.
People who have owned multi-cloud footprints and platform organisations at scale. Comfortable moving between the architecture, the operating model and the code itself.
People who have taken meaningful cost out of large cloud, licence and AI-token estates, and know how to keep it out without slowing the business down.
People who have restructured delivery organisations, changed the operating model, and lived through the quarter it took to settle. Practical, not doctrinal.
People who have sat in the seat, been accountable for the platform, and answered to a board when the number moved in the wrong direction. Now looking to do considered work with a small number of organisations.
A short note is enough. Tell us the work you have done at depth, the work you want to be doing next, and the kind of people you want to be doing it with. Every note is read personally.